TOK Essay Title May 2024
TOK Essay Title Scorecard
TOK essay title 1 ideas
Title 6: “Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.”
-
Introduction and Connection to the Title
â—‹ Rudimentary (1-2): Briefly mention what ‘most recent evidence’ means.
â—‹ Basic (3-4): Link the concept of ‘most recent evidence’ to the natural sciences and another area of knowledge you’ll discuss.
â—‹ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Frame the essay by dissecting the notion that newer evidence tends to be perceived as stronger, questioning its validity and outlining its potential implications in the chosen areas. -
Links to Areas of Knowledge
â—‹ Rudimentary (1-2): Just name the areas of knowledge.
â—‹ Basic (3-4): Provide a basic overview of how new evidence is treated in these areas.
â—‹ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Highlight specific moments or trends in your chosen areas where recent evidence revolutionized or complicated the field. -
Arguments and Examples
â—‹ Rudimentary (1-2): Make unsupported statements about the role of evidence.
â—‹ Basic (3-4): Mention a couple of examples where recent evidence made a difference but without depth.
â—‹ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Utilize real-world examples or case studies where the introduction of new evidence led to groundbreaking changes, controversies, or ethical quandaries. Discuss both the positive and negative aspects of this. -
Different Points of View
â—‹ Rudimentary to Basic: Neglect alternate perspectives or handle them superficially.
â—‹ Satisfactory (5-6): Acknowledge that not everyone may agree on the value of recent evidence.
â—‹ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Critically evaluate contrasting perspectives, perhaps introducing skepticism about new evidence or discussing the value of long-standing, traditional knowledge. -
Conclusion
â—‹ Rudimentary to Basic: Summarize points without offering a nuanced position.
â—‹ Satisfactory to Excellent: Pull together your arguments and counterarguments, pondering the implications and offering a nuanced, thought-provoking response to the title’s question.








