TOK Essay Title Example 1

TOK Essay Title May 2024

TOK Essay Title Scorecard

TOK essay title 1 ideas

Title 1: “Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?”

1. Introduction and Connection to the Title

   ○ Rudimentary (1-2): Briefly mention what subjectivity means in a general context.
   ○ Basic (3-4): Explain what subjectivity might mean within the domains of arts and history.
   ○ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Open with an insightful interpretation of subjectivity and its contrasting reception in the arts and history. Signal how you will explore these in relation to specific areas of knowledge.

2. Links to Areas of Knowledge (Arts and History)

   ○ Rudimentary (1-2): Simply state that the arts and history are relevant to the title.
   ○ Basic (3-4): Share common ways people view subjectivity in arts and history without deep analysis.
   ○ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Introduce thought-provoking angles on how subjectivity plays out in both fields. Think about the role of the artist/historian, societal values, etc.

3. Arguments and Examples

   ○ Rudimentary (1-2): Make broad claims like “Art is subjective” or “History should be objective.”
   ○ Basic (3-4): Perhaps use one or two general examples to support your claims.
   ○ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Develop intricate arguments supported by specific examples, such as a controversial historical event or an art movement that challenged norms.

4. Different Points of View

   ○ Rudimentary to Basic: Mostly avoid discussing counterarguments or alternate perspectives.
   ○ Satisfactory (5-6): Mention that some people might have differing views on subjectivity in arts and history.
   ○ Good (7-8) to Excellent (9-10): Critically evaluate the pros and cons of subjectivity in both areas. You might discuss the ethical implications or how subjectivity influences public perception.

5. Conclusion

   ○ Rudimentary to Basic: Sum up your thoughts without adding new insights.
   ○ Satisfactory to Excellent: Conclude by synthesizing your arguments, reflecting on the implications, and tying it all back to the initial interpretation of the title.